What is Disclosure?

by Walter M. Nowosad, Jr.   |   July 16, 2017 |  Updated July 31, 2017

INTRODUCTION

 

In late 2016, during one of my conversations with William Mills Tompkins,the topic of disclosure came up.  As you may know, William wrote Selected by Extraterrestrials, a book that touches on his life and work with US Navy Intelligence during WWII debriefing operatives and assembling and distributing packages of technological data to various universities, military, aviation manufacturing groups, and think tanks.  Later at Douglas Aircraft, Tompkins was in constant telepathic communication with three Nordic extraterrestrial secretaries, who arranged a meeting between Tompkins and  the heads of NASA: Kurt Heinrich Debus and Wernher von Braun, so that he could pitch systems engineering solutions to the then upcoming Apollo missions to the moon.  Tompkins' unique perspective and life profession convinces him that disclosure can be, and should be, managed like a project.  As such, he requested my input.

 

 

 

I took a few days to organize my thoughts on disclosure by reflecting on my exposure to various sources of material, such as my interviews of people I've posted on YouTube and my personal contact experience with the "visitors".  I've met and interviewed people like: Andrew D. Basiago, who claims to be among the first chrono-nauts (time travelers); Ralph Ring, who claims to have operated a circular foil craft in 1960 before it was confiscated by agents of the US Government; Bernard Mendez, who claimed to have been an extraterrestrial negotiator, who interfaced with "the creatures" in deep underground bases (such as "El Deuce") to determine their material requirements and needs.  I've seen the weird phenomena in the skies of Northern California, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and Washington state; and, I have personally experienced much more with my contact experience than I'm  willing to say here  I've seen, as I'm sure many of you have seen, Dr. Greer's Disclosure Project; and, I have attended one of his CE-5 splinter groups (rebels); and, I have watched more videos than I'm willing to admit.  If you're reading this, I'm sure you have, as well.

 

 

 

If you've never given serious thought to disclosure, I might suggest you try, as I have.  Feel free to disagree with me.  I'm not that attached to it.  This is simply a brief of my observations and opinions of how I think disclosure should appear.  I'll be the firs to admit it may be incomplete, a little askew, and at times irreverent.  Forgive me in advance for my loose critiques.  I assure you.  I'm harmless and carry no malice.  I figured the best place to begin is with Critical Assumptions; because, they tend to set the foundation for everything else that follows.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS

 

• Witness testimony alone does not constitute full or partial disclosure.

• Information and technology beneficial (BI&T) to all life exists and is being hidden.

• Information and technology detrimental (DI&T) to all life exists and is being hidden.

• I&T is being withheld or hoarded by stakeholders for various reasons.

• Any disclosure of I&T must include tangible proof.

• Disclosure of BI&T may result in beneficial global paradigm shifts.

• Disclosure should be orchestrated by a trusted entity and be executed in a completely transparent manner.

 

 

TWO TYPES OF DISCLOSURE

 

• Full disclosure is complete unfettered release of all I&T by stakeholders and includes the complete and unfettered access of I&T by everyone who wants it.

 

• Partial disclosure is a subset of full disclosure, which may imply either (i) a continuation of hoarding and secrecy of some I&T , or (ii) a continuation of secrecy of some I&T by stakeholders, in the interest of not  damaging or destroying physical and aetheric life in the universe and multiverse.

 

 

I&T STAKEHOLDERS

 

• Stakeholders are people, corporations, governments, and others, who own, control,  or otherwise suppress BI&T or DI&T.

 

EXAMPLES OF INFORMATION

 

• The existence, description, history, utilization, and mal effects of Detrimental I&T and rationale for not fulling disclosing it.

• Who are we; where did we come from; where are we going?

• The nature and condition of Earth; our solar system; our universe; the multiverse; and all life in all its forms everywhere.

• Subterranean intelligent life; subsurface intelligent life; extraterrestrial intelligent life; hyper-dimensional intelligent life; and the truth of our relationship with all of it.

• Politics & Exopolitics

• Religion & Spiritualism

• Truth vs. propaganda

• The mind-controlled & the controllers’ agendas

• History of everything

• Secret societies

• Break-away civilizations

• Experimentation, projects, manipulations, and activities undertaken by any being, which is detrimental to intelligent life, including humans and others, regardless of consent that is implied, assumed, or explicitly granted,

• Any experiment, project, manipulation, or activity that restricts intelligent life, including humans and others, from attaining their full spiritual and mental potential.

 

EXAMPLES OF TECHNOLOGY

 

Zero-point energy; cold plasma energy; free energy; clean fuels

• Anti-gravity or gravity cancellation & faster-than-light travel

• Intergalactic space ships and travel

• Time travel and teleportation

• Health Cures & non-allopathic medicine

• Life extension

• Mind-control

• Geo-engineering, HAARP, weather modification

 

 

POSSIBLE PROBLEMS

 

• Ceasing the all utilization of DI&T, which may include such things as nuclear power, nuclear weapons, time travel, cloning.

 

• Identifying a trusted entity to orchestrate and communicate all disclosure activities.

 

• Releasing people from long-term security oaths and authorizing them to disclose.

 

• non-compliance, continued hoarding, greed

 

• Releasing BI&T in such a way that is accessible to all and does not create strife, chaos, violence, retribution, etc.  Social and religious norms come to mind.

 

• Determining an effective means of disseminating I&T.

 

• Engaging in half-baked disclosure schemes, events, or activities that could be unwittingly founded upon false assumptions and disinformation, or solely upon witness testimonies – such as Steven Greer’s Washington DC Press Club event in c.2001.  This kind of event may raise awareness within the existing UFO community; but, does nothing to affect paradigm shifts by those who are positioned and most capable of creating them - Stakeholders.

 

• Acquiring unequivocal empirical proof that I&TB exists and is being withheld - without proof, the only logical reasons to engage in any kind of disclosure activities would be to propagate a hoax; to foster mass delusion; to control thought; or, to generate profit, etc.

 

• Identifying, vetting, and fully engaging the cooperation of valid stakeholders to come forward, share, and prove their I&T in a timely manner and with no delays.

 

• Full Disclosure self-destruction – vigilance is of key importance.  Disclosing un-vetted and unproven light and dark I&T could be problematic, especially when such I&T is founded upon speculation, assumptions, witness testimony, or less than empirical evidence.  The darker aspects of alleged ET abductions involving the killing and consumption of human children would be one example.

 

• Shifting global thought away from fear and control.

 

 

CURRENT DISCLOSURE EFFORTS

 

Let's look at disclosure activity.  From my perspective, there's a lot of flailing about.  Can you see it?  There are a number of groups playing at disclosure.  They use the the word disclosure to describe their activity and sell their conferences; books; websites; TV shows; but, none of it amounts  to true, transparent and honorable disclosure.  You've heard it.  I've heard it.  What is being announced from the pulpits of conferences?  We are the disclosure!  Hazzah!

 

Yea right.  Give me a break.

 

I'm not saying don't have conferences and don't sell books.  I'm saying please, give careful consideration to what true disclosure is, where everyone benefits significantly after it occurs.  Be real about it.  To date, what do we see?  We see increased awareness.  OK.  We see entertainment.  That's fine.  We see stories and testimonies.  Again, that's fine by me; but it really isn't disclosure; so, stop calling it that.  Why?  After all is  printed, said, done, and the conferences end, we have more questions than before, all-the-while, experiencing no change.  It's a lot of expended energy if no productive steps toward a unified goal are not taken.

 

We've seen the Disclosure Project and other events like this.  We've seen innumerable UFO and experience conferences.  We will see this month in Las Vegas, MUFON's Annual Symposium focusing on the hottest topic -- The Secret Space Program.   By now, you have to realize that we must be barking up the wrong tree.

 

It's clear to me that the stakeholders won't budge.

 

 

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again,

expecting different results.

    ~ Albert Einstein

 

 

Here are the issues with disclosure groups, events, A/V media, and other products:

 

1) ineffective / panacea – no changes or improvements in the human condition occur after events and consuming products; but, golly, people feel a little better.

2) self-serving – events, products, and media are created for profit, non-profit, entertainment and other purposes - such as distractions from real disclosure.

3) all sizzle and no steak – the focus is on the search and raising awareness of myriad narratives, rather than cracking the system of fear and hoarding by stakeholders...if they exist.

4)  not sharing the same vision or goals – no agreement on disclosure results - info vs. disinfo.

5)  limited in scope – focused on just one aspect, such as sightings and narratives

6)  mired in conspiracy – conspiracy is a natural byproduct, especially after time and money have been invested and donated, to no avail.

 

 

 

Guys, stop banging your heads against the wall.  Look, you're head is bruised.  Some of you have blood in your eyes.  Clearly, what you're doing is not accomplishing what I'd consider to be honest disclosure.   Listen to what Grant Cameron is says in this video.   They want to feed us clandestine disclosure, again.  It's been done before; an, if what Grant is saying is true, they're doing it again.  How long will you continue being distracted with people's narratives and chasing lights in the sky; investigating sightings and hoping to uncover some piece of physical evidence - proof beyond pictures, stories, and doubt - when we should be seeking to unveil the stakeholders and their secrets?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't think the Collective's rising awareness has gone unnoticed by the stakeholders.  Why one billion dollars?  Grant says someone with deep pockets is willing to  spend a billion dollars on a form of disclosure through Hollywood that I'm calling clandestine disclosure - hidden disclosure - partial disclosure - coded disclosure - to distract you from truth and reality and to divert your attention away from the stakeholders.

 

These CIA "mesiahs" are the stakeholders' pawns.  Don't eat the billion-dollar media tripe they're planning to feed you.  When it starts to come out, dig deeper.  Don't take it at face value.  Regardless of how big it may be, don't be satisfied. Insist on ripping back the curtain to reveal the people and secrets lurking behind it.  Bring them and their information and technology into the light for all to see and benefit from..  No more whistle-blowers - no more coded-symbolism entertainment - enough with the media games!  It's time to find these people and insist on nothing less than clear, honest, unadulterated communication of the truth.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

All due respect to Grant Cameron and to everyone else involved in doing their best to find proof and raise awareness, if we are to trust Grant Cameron's sources -- and, I'll admit, I'm all-in on the exaggerated extrapolation here to make a point -- there's a massive entertainment and marketing plan accompanying their plans that will make your conferences and meetings look like peanuts.  Heck, you thought  you had distraction and profits dialed in?  Shoot, just wait until the big boys arrive.  Grant says at the end of this video, it will be a partial disclosure facilitated by Hollywood and funded with a ton of money (Billion, actually - Remember: Grant said a billion dollars).

 

You now have my opinions about full and partial disclosure.  If the CIA's six new plans are real, as Grant Cameron says they are, I wonder what the Messiahs have concocted.  Can their partial disclosure be trusted as far as a special agent of the clandestine service - a small one - may be thrown?  Will their partial disclosure be transparent?  I doubt it, given the fact they're leaking clues of it to Grant; and, given the primary function of the CIA.  No, it won't be transparent - not to my expectation of honorable transparency.  We will likely see games played.  As huge as their partial disclosure may be, it's not transparent.  It is them tossing us a bone - a billion-dollar, six-faceted bone attached to a media marketing plan -- nothing more than a distraction to separate you from your income and keep us in the dark.

 

A half truth is still a lie.

 

The day the I&T Stakeholders reach out to, and communicate regularly with, the general public will be the day that true and honorable disclosure will begin in the light of day.  Until that day arrives, I remain hopeful that the truth and the proof will out.

 

Back to Top

 

 

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

INTRODUCTION

 

In late 2016, during one of my conversations with William Mills Tompkins,the topic of disclosure came up.  As you may know, William wrote Selected by Extraterrestrials, a book that touches on his life and work with US Navy Intelligence during WWII debriefing operatives and assembling and distributing packages of technological data to various universities, military, aviation manufacturing groups, and think tanks.  Later at Douglas Aircraft, Tompkins was in constant telepathic communication with three Nordic extraterrestrial secretaries, who arranged a meeting between Tompkins and  the heads of NASA: Kurt Heinrich Debus and Wernher von Braun, so that he could pitch systems engineering solutions to the then upcoming Apollo missions to the moon.  Tompkins' unique perspective and life profession convinces him that disclosure can be, and should be, managed like a project.  As such, he requested my input.

 

 

 

 

I took a few days to organize my thoughts on disclosure by reflecting on my exposure to various sources of material, such as my interviews of people I've posted on YouTube and my personal contact experience with the "visitors".  I've met and interviewed people like: Andrew D. Basiago, who claims to be among the first chrono-nauts (time travelers); Ralph Ring, who claims to have operated a circular foil craft in 1960 before it was confiscated by agents of the US Government; Bernard Mendez, who claimed to have been an extraterrestrial negotiator, who interfaced with "the creatures" in deep underground bases (such as "El Deuce") to determine their material requirements and needs.  I've seen the weird phenomena in the skies of Northern California, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and Washington state; and, I have personally experienced much more with my contact experience than I'm  willing to say here  I've seen, as I'm sure many of you have seen, Dr. Greer's Disclosure Project; and, I have attended one of his CE-5 splinter groups (rebels); and, I have watched more videos than I'm willing to admit.  If you're reading this, I'm sure you have, as well.

 

If you've never given serious thought to disclosure, I might suggest you try, as I have.  Feel free to disagree with me.  I'm not that attached to it.  This is simply a brief of my observations and opinions of how I think disclosure should appear.  I'll be the firs to admit it may be incomplete, a little askew, and at times irreverent.  Forgive me in advance for my loose critiques.  I assure you.  I'm harmless and carry no malice.  I figured the best place to begin is with Critical Assumptions; because, they tend to set the foundation for everything else that follows.

 

 

 

CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS

 

• Witness testimony alone does not constitute full or partial disclosure.

• Information and technology beneficial (BI&T) to all life exists and is being hidden.

• Information and technology detrimental (DI&T) to all life exists and is being hidden.

• I&T is being withheld or hoarded by stakeholders for various reasons.

• Any disclosure of I&T must include tangible proof.

• Disclosure of BI&T may result in beneficial global paradigm shifts.

• Disclosure should be orchestrated by a trusted entity and be executed in a completely transparent manner.

 

 

 

 

 

TWO TYPES OF DISCLOSURE

 

• Full disclosure is complete unfettered release of all I&T by stakeholders and includes the complete and unfettered access of I&T by everyone who wants it.

 

• Partial disclosure is a subset of full disclosure, which may imply either (i) a continuation of hoarding and secrecy of some I&T , or (ii) a continuation of secrecy of some I&T by stakeholders, in the interest of not  damaging or destroying physical and aetheric life in the universe and multiverse.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I&T STAKEHOLDERS

 

• Stakeholders are people, corporations, governments, and others, who own, control,  or otherwise suppress BI&T or DI&T.

 

 

EXAMPLES OF INFORMATION

 

• The existence, description, history, utilization, and mal effects of Detrimental I&T and rationale for not fulling disclosing it.

• Who are we; where did we come from; where are we going?

• The nature and condition of Earth; our solar system; our universe; the multiverse; and all life in all its forms everywhere.

• Subterranean intelligent life; subsurface intelligent life; extraterrestrial intelligent life; hyper-dimensional intelligent life; and the truth of our relationship with all of it.

• Politics & Exopolitics

• Religion & Spiritualism

• Truth vs. propaganda

• The mind-controlled & the controllers’ agendas

• History of everything

• Secret societies

• Break-away civilizations

• Experimentation, projects, manipulations, and activities undertaken by any being, which is detrimental to intelligent life, including humans and others, regardless of consent that is implied, assumed, or explicitly granted,

• Any experiment, project, manipulation, or activity that restricts intelligent life, including humans and others, from attaining their full spiritual and mental potential.

 

EXAMPLES OF TECHNOLOGY

 

Zero-point energy; cold plasma energy; free energy; clean fuels

• Anti-gravity or gravity cancellation & faster-than-light travel

• Intergalactic space ships and travel

• Time travel and teleportation

• Health Cures & non-allopathic medicine

• Life extension

• Mind-control

• Geo-engineering, HAARP, weather modification

 

 

POSSIBLE PROBLEMS

 

• Ceasing the all utilization of DI&T, which may include such things as nuclear power, nuclear weapons, time travel, cloning.

 

• Identifying a trusted entity to orchestrate and communicate all disclosure activities.

 

• Releasing people from long-term security oaths and authorizing them to disclose.

 

• non-compliance, continued hoarding, greed

 

• Releasing BI&T in such a way that is accessible to all and does not create strife, chaos, violence, retribution, etc.  Social and religious norms come to mind.

 

• Determining an effective means of disseminating I&T.

 

• Engaging in half-baked disclosure schemes, events, or activities that could be unwittingly founded upon false assumptions and disinformation, or solely upon witness testimonies – such as Steven Greer’s Washington DC Press Club event in c.2001.  This kind of event may raise awareness within the existing UFO community; but, does nothing to affect paradigm shifts by those who are positioned and most capable of creating them - Stakeholders.

 

• Acquiring unequivocal empirical proof that I&TB exists and is being withheld - without proof, the only logical reasons to engage in any kind of disclosure activities would be to propagate a hoax; to foster mass delusion; to control thought; or, to generate profit, etc.

 

• Identifying, vetting, and fully engaging the cooperation of valid stakeholders to come forward, share, and prove their I&T in a timely manner and with no delays.

 

• Full Disclosure self-destruction – vigilance is of key importance.  Disclosing un-vetted and unproven light and dark I&T could be problematic, especially when such I&T is founded upon speculation, assumptions, witness testimony, or less than empirical evidence.  The darker aspects of alleged ET abductions involving the killing and consumption of human children would be one example.

 

• Shifting global thought away from fear and control.

 

Back to Top

 

 

CURRENT DISCLOSURE EFFORTS

 

Let's look at disclosure activity.  From my perspective, there's a lot of flailing about.  Can you see it?  There are a number of groups playing at disclosure.  They use the the word disclosure to describe their activity and sell their conferences; books; websites; TV shows; but, none of it amounts  to true, transparent and honorable disclosure.  You've heard it.  I've heard it.  What is being announced from the pulpits of conferences?  We are the disclosure!  Hazzah!

 

Yea right.  Give me a break.

 

I'm not saying don't have conferences and don't sell books.  I'm saying please, give careful consideration to what true disclosure is, where everyone benefits significantly after it occurs.  Be real about it.  To date, what do we see?  We see increased awareness.  OK.  We see entertainment.  That's fine.  We see stories and testimonies.  Again, that's fine by me; but it really isn't disclosure; so, stop calling it that.  Why?  After all is  printed, said, done, and the conferences end, we have more questions than before, all-the-while, experiencing no change.  It's a lot of expended energy if no productive steps toward a unified goal are not taken.

 

We've seen the Disclosure Project and other events like this.  We've seen innumerable UFO and experience conferences.  We will see this month in Las Vegas, MUFON's Annual Symposium focusing on the hottest topic -- The Secret Space Program.   By now, you have to realize that we must be barking up the wrong tree.

 

It's clear to me that the stakeholders won't budge.

 

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results.

 

    ~ Albert Einstein

 

Here are the issues with disclosure groups, events, A/V media, and other products:

 

1) ineffective / panacea – no changes or improvements in the human condition occur after events and consuming products; but, golly, people feel a little better.

2) self-serving – events, products, and media are created for profit, non-profit, entertainment and other purposes - such as distractions from real disclosure.

3) all sizzle and no steak – the focus is on the search and raising awareness of myriad narratives, rather than cracking the system of fear and hoarding by stakeholders...if they exist.

4)  not sharing the same vision or goals – no agreement on disclosure results - info vs. disinfo.

5)  limited in scope – focused on just one aspect, such as sightings and narratives

6)  mired in conspiracy – conspiracy is a natural byproduct, especially after time and money have been invested and donated, to no avail.

 

Guys, stop banging your heads against the wall.  Look, you're head is bruised.  Some of you have blood in your eyes.  Clearly, what you're doing is not accomplishing what I'd consider to be honest disclosure.   Just listen to what Grant Cameron is says in this video.   They want to feed us clandestine disclosure, again.  It's been done before; an, if what Grant is saying is true, they're doing it again.  How long will you continue being distracted with people's narratives and chasing lights in the sky; investigating sightings and hoping to uncover some piece of physical evidence - proof beyond pictures, stories, and doubt - when we should be seeking to unveil the stakeholders and their secrets?

 

 

 

 

I don't think the Collective's rising awareness has gone unnoticed by the stakeholders.  Why one billion dollars?  Grant says someone with deep pockets is willing to  spend a billion dollars on a form of disclosure through Hollywood that I'm calling clandestine disclosure - hidden disclosure - partial disclosure - coded disclosure - to distract you from truth and reality and to divert your attention away from the stakeholders.

 

These CIA "mesiahs" are the stakeholders' lapdogs.  Don't eat the billion dollar media tripe they're planning to feed you.  When it starts to come out, dig deeper.  Don't take it at face value.  Regardless of how big it may be, don't be satisfied. Insist on ripping back the curtain to reveal the ones behind the curtain.  Bring them and their information and technology into the light for all to see.  No more whistle-blowers - no more coded entertainment - no more media games!  It's time to find these people and insist on nothing less than clear, honest, unadulterated communication of the truth.

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

All due respect to Grant Cameron and to everyone else involved in doing their best to find proof and raise awareness, if we are to trust Grant Cameron's sources -- and, I'll admit, I'm all-in on the exaggerated extrapolation here to make a point -- there's a massive entertainment and marketing plan accompanying their plans that will make your conferences and meetings look like peanuts.  Heck, you thought  you had distraction and profits dialed in?  Shoot, just wait until the big boys arrive.  Grant says at the end of this video, it will be a partial disclosure facilitated by Hollywood and funded with a ton of money (Billion, actually - Grant used the word the word billion).

 

You now have my opinions about full and partial disclosure.  If the CIA's six new plans are real, as Grant Cameron says they are, I wonder what the Messiahs have concocted.  Can their partial disclosure be trusted as far as a special agent of the clandestine service - a small one - may be thrown?  Will their partial disclosure be transparent?  I doubt it, given the fact they're leaking clues of it to Grant; and, given the primary function of the CIA.  No, it won't be transparent - not to my expectation of honorable transparency.  We will likely see games played.  As huge as their partial disclosure may be, it's not transparent.  It is them tossing us a bone - a billion-dollar, six-faceted bone attached to a media marketing plan -- nothing more than a distraction to separate you from your income and keep us in the dark.

 

A half truth is still a lie.

 

The day the I&T Stakeholders reach out to, and communicate regularly with the general public will be the day that true and honorable disclosure will begin in the light of day.  Until that day arrives, I remain hopeful that the truth and the proof will out.

 

Back to Top